Tuesday, February 19, 2008

It’s time to work it out; let’s not simply bailout...


ARINDAM CHAUDHURI’S 4 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE IIPM...

US real-estate bubble is fed with the same malfeasance as the ’90s stock-market bubble

IN April, Paul Krugman, Columnist, The New York TimesHenry Paulson, the Treasury Secretary, declared that all the signs he saw indicated that the housing market was “at or near the bottom.” He insisted that problems caused by the meltdown in the market for subprime mortgages were “largely contained.” But the time for denial is past as both housing starts & applications for building permits have fallen to their lowest levels in a decade, showing that home construction is still in free fall. And if historical relationships are any guide, then the housing slump will probably be with us for years, not months. It’s becoming clear that the mortgage problem is anything but contained. It’s not just confined to subprime mortgages, which are loans to people who don’t satisfy the standard financial criteria. There are also growing problems in socalled Alt-A mortgages, which are another 20% of the mortgage market. Problems are starting to appear in prime loans too.

Many on Wall Street are clamouring for a bailout – for someone to step in & buy mortgage-backed securities from troubled hedge funds. But that would be like saving bad actors from the consequences of their misdeeds. For it is becoming increasingly clear that the real-estate bubble of recent years, like the stock bubble of the late ’90s, both caused and was fed by widespread misconduct. Rating agencies like Moody’s Investors Service, seem to have played a similar role to that played by complacent accountants in the corporate scandals of a few years ago. In the ’90s, accountants certified dubious earning statements; in this decade, rating agencies declared dubious mortgage-backed securities to be highest quality, AAA assets. Yet our desire to avoid letting bad actors off the hook shouldn’t prevent us from doing the right thing for borrowers who were victims of the bubble.

Most It’s time to work it out; let’s not simply bailout...of the proposals for dealing with the problems of subprime borrowers are of the locking-the-barn-door-after-the-horse-is gone variety: They would curb abusive lending practices – which would have been very useful three years ago – but they wouldn’t help much now. What we need at this point is a policy to deal with the consequences of the housing bust.

Consider a borrower who can’t meet the mortgage payments and is facing foreclosure. In the past, the bank would oft en have been willing to offer a workout, modifying the loan’s terms to make it affordable, because what the borrower was able to pay would be worth more to the bank than its incurring the costs of foreclosure and trying to resell the home. Today, however, the mortgage broker who made the loan is usually the first link in a financial merry-go-round. The mortgage was bundled with others and sold to investment banks, which in turn sliced and diced the claims to produce artificial assets that Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s were willing to classify as AAA. And the result – there’s nobody to deal with.

Looks like a clear case of government intervention. There’s a serious market failure, and fixing that could greatly help hundreds of thousands of Americans. The federal government shouldn’t be providing bailouts, rather help to arrange workouts. This would need a lot of work, from lawyers as well as financial experts. It would involve federal agencies buying mortgages – not the securities conjured up from these mortgages, but the original loans – at a steep discount, then renegotiating the terms. The point, is that doing nothing isn’t the only alternative to letting the parties who got us into this mess off the hook. Say no to bailouts – but let’s help borrowers work things out.

For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article Source : IIPM Editorial, 2007

An
IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

For More IIPM Info, Visit Below....
The Sunday Indian - India's Greatest News weekly
IIPM Mumbai Parables - Stories that change life
IIPM International Student Exchange Programme
IIPM, ADMISSIONS FOR NEW DELHI & GURGAON BRANCHES
IIPM, GURGAON
IIPM Economy Review
IIPM :- Cicero's Challenge is going global
The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (I...
Time for Awards at IIPM


Thursday, February 07, 2008

The Nuclear Discord?

Have The Nuclear Discord? you heard the tale of seven blind men dishing out their own profound insights over an elephant? Cut through the fog of jargon being dished out by pundits, propagandists and ideologues over the controversial nuclear deal between India and the United States and you can’t help recalling that story. Each pundit has his or her own take; each commentator claims complete mastery over the subject and each ideologue prefers to project his blinkered vision as the one that serves best the interests of India. Unfortunately, even the mainstream media seems to have succumbed to the temptation of pamphleteering and propaganda. Suddenly, television channels, newspapers and magazines are full of stories about how the nuclear deal is the greatest thing that has happened to India since Gautam Budha was born. Suddenly, the United States of America has become the best friend, ally and strategic partner that India has ever had in its long and chequered history. Suddenly, everybody seems to be suggesting that the nuclear deal will almost magically solve India’s intractable problem of energy security.

It doesn’t help matters when the opposition to the nuclear deal comes primarily from the Left , which stands badly discredited in eyes of urban middle class Indians because of its own double standards and more importantly, because of the intemperate manner in which the apparatchiks of the CPM and the CPI dictate terms to the UPA government. Besides, the CPM is perceived to be batting on behalf of the Chinese State; not the smartest thing to do at the moment. Even the opposition displayed by the BJP has no credibility because it was the BJP led NDA government that initiated the dialogue with Uncle Sam that has culminated in the nuclear deal.

What’s missing in all this is a sober, objective and unemotional assessment of the issues involved. After all, it is foreign policy and India’s strategic interests that one is talking about; not a Hindi soap where emotions, drama, tears and wails rule over facts. But then, India’s tragedy has been that its leaders have usually pursued foreign policy and strategic interests in an emotional and populist manner, unlike Great powers like America and China whose strategists think 30 years down the road.

For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2007

An
IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

For More IIPM Info, Visit Below....
The Sunday Indian - India's Greatest News weekly
IIPM International Student Exchange Programme
IIPM, ADMISSIONS FOR NEW DELHI & GURGAON BRANCHES
IIPM, GURGAON
ARINDAM CHAUDHURI’S 4 REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD CHOOSE IIPM...
IIPM Economy Review
IIPM :- Cicero's Challenge is going global
The Indian Institute of Planning and Management (I...
Time for Awards at IIPM
STUDENTS AGAINST CORRUPTION & KICKBACKS : SACK
Heavy dut(t)y stress Sanjay Dutt Bollywood Actor
The Business of B-School Rankings & The Big Farce